The Surge in Candidate Ghosting

In the ever-changing realm of recruitment, an alarming trend is gaining pace– the ghosting of candidates. This blog aims to clarify the concept of ghosting in the hiring process, investigate the reasons behind its growing prevalence, and examine the impacts it has on candidates and companies alike. Let’s delve into why taking part in this practice is counterproductive and explore strategies to foster better communication during the hiring journey.

What Do We Mean by Ghosting?

Unravelling the Enigma:

Ghosting in the context of recruitment refers to the abrupt and unexplained end of communication between employers or recruiters and job candidates. It’s akin to submitting your resume into a void, never to receive updates, feedback, or closure regarding your application.

The Silent Treatment:

Candidates who experience ghosting are left in the dark, unsure of their application status or whether the position has been filled. This lack of communication causes frustration and uncertainty, tarnishing the candidate’s view of the company and the recruitment process.

Why is Ghosting on the Rise?

Digital Disconnection:

With the digital age revolutionisng the hiring process, it has also created impersonal communication. With the ease of online applications and auto systems, the personal touch in candidate communication often takes a back seat.

Increased Competition:

In today’s fiercely competitive job market, employers may be inundated with a high volume of applications for a single position. The sheer number of candidates can make it hard for recruiters to respond separately, adding to ghosting as a coping mechanism.

Time Constraints:

Recruiters often face tight schedules and competing priorities. In the rush to fill positions quickly, the human side of recruitment can be overshadowed, contributing to the prevalence of ghosting.

Impacts of Ghosting:

Ghosting Causes Candidate Fallout:

Ghosting profoundly affects job candidates. The uncertainty and lack of closure can lead to feelings of rejection, frustration, and a diminished perception of the hiring company. This negative experience may influence the candidate’s decision to engage with the company in the future or recommend it to others.

Damaged Employer Brand:

The practice of ghosting doesn’t just affect candidates; it tarnishes the reputation of the hiring organisation. A poor candidate experience can be shared online, dissuading potential applicants and damaging the employer brand.

Missed Opportunities from Ghosting:

By ghosting candidates, employers may miss out on potential talent. That could mean a candidate who feels valued and respected during the recruitment process is more likely to become a committed and engaged employee.

Negative Impact on Employee Morale:

Existing employees who witness or hear about the ghosting of candidates may experience a decline in morale. This can erode trust in leadership and the company’s commitment to treating individuals with respect.

Breaking the Silence: A Better Approach

Transparent Communication:

The antidote to ghosting is transparent communication. Keep candidates informed about the status of their application, whether positive or negative. Establish clear communication channels to manage expectations and provide regular updates.

Personalised Feedback:

Offering constructive feedback, even in rejection, demonstrates respect for the candidate’s time and effort. Providing insights into the decision-making process can help candidates understand areas for improvement.

Utilise Technology Wisely:

While technology can streamline recruitment processes, it should enhance, not replace, human interaction. Leverage automation for administrative tasks, but ensure that there are mechanisms in place for meaningful, personalised communication.

Conclusion:

Ghosting candidates is a detrimental practice that adversely affects both individuals seeking employment and the organisations conducting the hiring. As responsible recruiters and employers, it’s essential to recognise the impacts of ghosting and commit to fostering a culture of open, respectful communication.

By embracing transparency, providing feedback, and utilising technology judiciously, we can collectively contribute to a more positive and constructive recruitment experience for everyone involved. It’s time to break the silence, bridge the communication gap, and build stronger connections in the world of hiring.

OUR FOCUS ON LONG-TERM PARTNERSHIPS

At re:find we have been in Executive Search for over 20 years. We believe that recruitment is not a one-off transaction but rather a long-term partnership. We aim to build long-term relationships with our clients, providing ongoing support and advice to help them find and retain the best talent for their organisation.

In addition, as a business, we understand that every organisation is unique and that there is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to recruitment. That’s why we offer bespoke recruitment solutions that are tailored to meet the specific needs of each client. Whether you need help with a single hire or a full recruitment campaign, we can help.

We are committed to providing our clients with the highest quality service. As part of this, we ensure that we take the time to understand your organisation’s culture and values, as well as the specific skills and experience needed for each role.

For more information on our executive search practice and our CCS framework
please get in touch with our Managing Director, James Cumming.

Should recruiters only focus on money?

When I was at a large recruitment firm it was drilled into me…FOCUS ON THE MONEY! But is that really what we should be focusing on? I’m not so sure.

Now I am not saying money isn’t important (and I do know that recruiters are meant to be money hungry savages…) but is that what really motivates us!?

The fuel

Simon Sinek says “The purpose of a car is to go somewhere and fuel helps you get there. The purpose of a company is to accomplish something, to advance in a greater cause, to contribute to society. And money will help you get there.” You can see the full analogy on a video here.

His analogy makes a lot of sense to me – I don’t think most people are motivated by money, they are motivated by purpose.

Why do most recruiters get frustrated or leave the industry? Because they have nothing to aim for apart from the here and now. This gets boring after a while unless you have something else you are aiming for.

The purpose

HINT: Your businesses purpose isn’t that your firm wants to make X million pounds this year.

It might be your driver as the owner/shareholder – but guess what, your people couldn’t care less if you get a big bonus or an earn-out or not. Most people care about how things impact them (not you).

Deloitte’s Millennial survey said that 60% of millennials said that a sense of purpose was part of the reason they’d chose to work at a company.

In another survey by Gallup millennials said they would rather have a pay cut than work for a company that was not ethical. 

Money isn’t the be-all and end-all

This proves my point – money isn’t the be-all and end-all. For me, the goal is to become better at what you do and do better than what you did before (more refined? Or re:find!) Not only is this more enjoyable, it is more developmental for individuals and your clients benefit too.

Ultimately, it’s about the service you give to others – we are supposed to be in the business of helping people, aren’t we?

To discuss further, you can email me on James@refind.co.uk.

You can view more about James Cumming our change and business transformation specialist here.

Hiring an Interim Executive? You need to get it right! Discover the 8 step process you should follow, by downloading our free eBook here.