Wellbeing in the workplace

Written by

Wellbeing in the workplace is fast becoming just as important, if not more so, than salary or career progression. One issue at the forefront of this is mental health in the workplace. We are all aware of the importance of wellbeing, but could we be doing more?

 

Surveys over recent years have shown the true impact of poor mental health:

  • 1 in 6.8 people experience mental health problems in the workplace (14.7%) 
  • Evidence suggests that 12.7% of all sickness absence days in the UK can be attributed to mental health conditions.
  • Deloitte says poor mental health in the workplace is equivalent to almost 2% of UK GDP (in 2016).
  • 89% of workers with mental health problems report an impact on their working life.
  • Just 13% of employees would be comfortable talking about mental illness at work.
  • Last year, poor employee mental health cost UK employers £42bn.
  • The return on investment of workplace mental health interventions is overwhelmingly positive, with an average ROI of 4:1.

 

We found that: 

  • Kindness and wellbeing have a significant impact on culture and the engagement of colleagues.
  • Our brain is our most powerful tool, yet we are not taught how we can manage it to get the best out of it. This needs to change. 
  • The fear of failure and constantly striving for perfection are massive contributors to poor mental health – but is in our control if we are aware of it.

 

So what can employers do to support an employee with their mental health and wellbeing?

 

Discuss
Ensure that you create an environment that is open, that encourages staff to discuss their challenges and problems. Have a culture of openness that allows you to go beyond a person’s workload, instead, it delves deeper into their role responsibilities and the opportunities that they would like to see appear. We know that 13% of employers would feel comfortable talking about their mental health and that percentage needs to be much higher!

Educate
Know what to do if a mental health problem arises within your workplace, such as where to direct the employees if they require specialist help. Also, educate yourself and staff on various mental health problems, so you can see the trigger. Always remember to be sensitive.

Be clear
The groundwork can be set from the minute a new recruit starts, just by letting them know that if any problem arises, big or small, that they can discuss it. It doesn’t take much to make an employee feel supported or to create a culture of openness, especially if it means it decreases the chances of mental health problems in the workplace. You could create a wellbeing policy with relevant support links and contact details, which is always available to employees. 

We have recently become a ‘Mindful Employer’ – we recognise that in the UK, people experiencing mental ill-health continue to report stigma and discrimination at work. Having signed the ‘Charter for Employers Positive about Mental Health’, we are committed to creating a supportive and open culture, where colleagues feel able to talk about mental health confidently, and aspire to appropriately support the mental wellbeing of all staff.

 

As an employer, we have made an on-going commitment to:

 

  • Provide non-judgemental and proactive support to staff experiencing mental ill-health.
  • Not make assumptions about a person with a mental health condition and their ability to work.
  • Be positive and enabling all employees and job applicants with a mental health condition.
  • Support line managers in managing mental health in the workplace.
  • Ensure we are fair in the recruitment of new staff in accordance with the Equality Act (2010).
  • Make it clear that people who have experienced mental ill-health will not be discriminated against, and that disclosure of a mental health problem will enable both the employee and employer to assess and provide the right level of support or adjustment.

 

 It’s so important to make sure you have a balance between your work and home life – we’re big advocates of it here.

If you’re struggling with your mental health at work or in general – mental health charity MIND can offer lots of help and support. Here are tips for staying well at work. 

 

If you would like to find out more about re:find and how we can support you and your business then please get in touch.

James Cumming is our MD, Interim and Transformation Search specialist. If you’ve got a hard-to-fill role and need some help, get in touch. Connect with him on LinkedIn.

Can You Give a Bad Reference Without Being Sued? A Comprehensive Guide

Written by

Can You Give a Bad Reference Without Being Sued?

Giving a reference for a former employee can feel like walking a tightrope. You want to be fair and honest, but there’s always the fear of potential legal repercussions. Many employers now stick to giving “neutral” references — only confirming dates of employment and job title. This policy is legally safe and helps avoid disputes, particularly with difficult employees. But is there a way to be more transparent while still staying on the right side of the law? Absolutely. Let’s explore how you can manage this delicate balance with a few practical insights and case studies.

The Rise of the “Neutral” Reference (Rather than a Bad Reference)

Rather than give a bad reference, a neutral reference is often the safest route. It provides only the most basic information: dates of employment and job title. Many businesses adopt this policy to mitigate risks, especially in cases where they might have concerns about an employee’s past performance. This approach is legally sound and prevents claims of defamation or discrimination. However, for recruiters and hiring managers, a neutral reference can raise red flags, potentially costing candidates job opportunities.

Case Study: The Impact of Neutral References

A few years ago, a mid-sized tech company in London, facing a wave of litigation threats over giving a bad reference, switched to a strict neutral reference policy. This initially seemed like a good move — the legal department was relieved, and managers avoided difficult conversations. However, the unintended consequence was that it became harder for the company to support its high-performing alumni. Talented employees who had left for new opportunities found it challenging to secure their next roles without the backing of a strong reference. This policy also negatively impacted the company’s reputation as a good employer. Eventually, the company revised its policy to allow more detailed references under controlled conditions, balancing legal safety with fairness.

So, how can you stay transparent while avoiding legal trouble? Here are five ways:

1. Be Honest from the Outset and Don’t See it as a Bad Reference

If you can’t, in good conscience, recommend an employee for a new role, it’s best to be upfront with them. Inform them directly that you’re unable to provide a positive reference (giving a bad reference is probably not a good idea). This gives the employee the chance to seek another reference and prevents any surprises. A case in point is a large retailer in Birmingham that adopted this policy. By having an honest conversation with departing employees, they reduced the number of disputes and set clear expectations, which led to fewer legal claims and smoother exits.

2. Cite Time as a Factor

If the employee worked for you several years ago, you could decline to provide a detailed reference on the grounds that it was too long ago to remember specifics accurately. Many organisations use this approach, citing concerns about providing outdated or potentially misleading information. For example, a financial services firm was once sued for defamation based on an outdated reference. They now refuse all references older than five years, which has successfully shielded them from further legal trouble.

3. Stick to Your Company’s Reference Policy

If you choose to give a neutral reference, be prepared to clarify if this is the company’s standard policy or specific to the individual. In a recent survey by Refind, over 60% of HR professionals reported that reference checkers often asked why a reference was neutral. This demonstrates the importance of consistency. One healthcare organisation found that explaining its neutral reference policy upfront built trust and helped avoid any legal ambiguity.

4. Be Factual and Objective

If you do decide to give a reference that includes feedback, ensure that you stick strictly to facts. Focus on observable behaviour and documented outcomes. For instance, rather than saying, “They were a poor performer,” specify, “They did not meet their sales targets for three consecutive quarters.” An example from a large law firm illustrates this point: after a lawsuit over a subjective reference, they trained their managers to provide only fact-based information, which significantly reduced legal risks.

5. Communicate Performance Regularly

Make sure employees are aware of where they stand regarding their performance well before they leave. If performance issues are addressed regularly, an employee will know what to expect from a reference. A global engineering firm found that by integrating performance feedback into quarterly reviews and keeping records, they were better prepared to provide accurate references. This practice has helped them avoid contentious disputes and maintained their reputation.

Key Takeaways

Navigating references can indeed feel like a minefield, but sticking to these strategies can help you stay clear of legal trouble while remaining honest and transparent:

  • Be upfront and clear with employees about their potential reference.
  • Use time as a justification to avoid referencing older employees.
  • Consistently apply a neutral policy or make clear the context of neutrality.
  • Stick to facts and documented evidence to avoid subjective assessments.
  • Maintain regular performance communications to set expectations clearly.

By balancing transparency with caution, you protect your organisation from unnecessary legal risk while supporting both past and future employees effectively. In the end, being a good employer isn’t just about avoiding lawsuits — it’s also about maintaining trust and integrity in every step of the employment relationship.

OUR FOCUS ON LONG-TERM PARTNERSHIPS

At re:find we have been in Executive Search for over 20 years. We believe that recruitment is not a one-off transaction but rather a long-term partnership. We aim to build long-term relationships with our clients, providing ongoing support and advice to help them find and retain the best talent for their organisation.

In addition, as a business, we understand that every organisation is unique and that there is no one-size-fits-all solution when it comes to recruitment. That’s why we offer bespoke recruitment solutions that are tailored to meet the specific needs of each client. Whether you need help with a single hire or a full recruitment campaign, we can help.

We are committed to providing our clients with the highest quality service. As part of this, we ensure that we take the time to understand your organisation’s culture and values, as well as the specific skills and experience needed for each role.

For more information on our executive search practice and our CCS framework
please get in touch with our Managing Director, James Cumming.

Workplace Flexibility: Is It Worth the Effort?

Written by

Workplace Flexibility: Is It Worth the Effort?

In today’s evolving work environment, many companies have embraced flexibility as a core component of their employee experience. However, some organisations have been slower to adopt these practices, raising the question: Is workplace flexibility truly beneficial, or does it create more challenges than it’s worth?

What Is Workplace Flexibility?

Flexible working refers to any work arrangement that allows employees to tailor their work schedules or environments to better suit their needs. This could mean working from home, having flexible start and finish times, or even job-sharing.

Despite its growing popularity, research highlights a disparity in how flexible working is implemented. For instance, a recent HR Magazine article revealed that men typically enjoy six hours of flexible working per week, while women only receive three. This discrepancy raises concerns about equality in the workplace and highlights the need for more inclusive policies.

The Case for Flexible Working

With the rise of Generation Y, who prioritise work-life balance and value working to live rather than living to work, the demand for flexible working arrangements has increased. Here are some of the key benefits:

  • Increased Productivity: Employees often perform better when they have control over their schedules.
  • Improved Morale: Flexibility can boost employee satisfaction and happiness at work.
  • Enhanced Work Enjoyment: Employees are more likely to enjoy their work when it fits around their personal lives.
  • Better Work-Life Balance: Flexibility allows employees to manage their personal and professional responsibilities more effectively.
  • Reduced Tardiness: Employees can start work at a time that suits them, leading to fewer late arrivals.
  • Stronger Employee Loyalty: Companies offering flexibility are likely to see greater loyalty and commitment from their employees.
  • Lower Employee Turnover: Flexibility can reduce the risk of employees leaving for more accommodating employers.
  • Reduced Burnout: Flexible arrangements can help prevent employee burnout by allowing for better stress management.
  • Decreased Commuting Stress: Less time spent commuting reduces fuel costs and stress, leading to happier, more focused employees.
  • Lower Office Costs: With fewer employees needing to be in the office, companies can save on fixed office expenses.

The Drawbacks of Flexible Working

However, flexible working is not without its challenges:

  • Not Suitable for Everyone: Some employees may struggle with the lack of structure.
  • Managerial Challenges: Managers may find it difficult to adjust to or monitor flexible working arrangements.
  • Blurred Work-Home Boundaries: Employees might find it hard to separate work from personal life when working from home.
  • Monitoring Work Output: It can be challenging to ensure that employees are actually working when they’re not in the office.
  • Potential for Abuse: Some employees might take advantage of the flexibility, leading to decreased productivity.
  • System Limitations: Businesses must ensure they have the right systems in place to manage a remote or flexible workforce effectively.

The Future of Workplace Flexibility

At first glance, the benefits of flexible working seem to outweigh the drawbacks, which explains why many forward-thinking companies have already adopted this approach. However, for organisations that have yet to embrace flexibility, the transition can be daunting. Resistance to change and a preference for traditional work practices are common barriers.

Nonetheless, the tide is turning. As older generations retire and younger, more flexibility-driven employees enter the workforce, the adoption of flexible working is likely to increase. Companies that adapt quickly to this shift will position themselves as employers of choice, attracting top talent in a competitive market.

In the emerging ‘gig economy,’ the businesses that thrive will be those that understand and implement workplace flexibility effectively. These organisations will not only win the war for talent but will also build a resilient, future-ready workforce.

If you’d like to explore how flexible working could benefit your organisation, feel free to reach out to me at James@refind.co.uk.

For more information about James Cumming, our change and business transformation specialist, click here.